5
July
2012

Critical Path Method and Program Evaluation Review techinique

To develop a project through a detailed planning, there are basically two techniques: Critical Path Method and Program Evaluation Review techinique.

The CPM was founded in 1957 by the work of Walker and Kelly to improve the planning for the management of large construction projects at the organization Du Pont.

Instead PERT has its origins in the military to a certain number of researchers were asked to develop and implement a management system for the realization of a ballistic missile named "Polaris"

The main objective that was meant to be achieved, was to have the delivery of the finished product, the missile to a date certain and fixed.

Both PERT and CPM that are represented graphically by means of oriented features, which differs from the CPM PERT dealing with uncertainty in the project; Critical Path Method, adheres to the deterministic criteria and the PERT, Project Evolution Review Technique, is a mix between deterministic and stochastic.  

The PERT is convenient in the case of projects where the duration can be random while the CPM is more logical in situations where there is a need for more accurate and detailed definition of resources and time.

The main activities to be undertaken at the end of a correct application of methods of Perot CPM are as follows:

Definition of project activities that are going to take.

Temporality of the activities that are going to put in place technical specifications, contractual commitments.

Life cycle of the project.

Regardless of whether you are using the PERT or CPM will be used to break down the various stages of the project through the use of a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), in this way, the project will have different levels of importance in being able to give a determined time and resources optimizing costs to be allocated to the management of the project.

About the author: Gianluca Gaggioli

Gianluca Gaggioli: married, with three children, all born within walking distance, you do not know how do you find the time to "enjoy" on the issues of quality and management. For over ten years working in the railway sector and medical in the role of "Quality Assurance and Quality Management Systems." Specific skills: Quality Management According to the EN ISO 9001, EN ISO 13485, IRIS (International Railway Industry Standard), Six Sigma, Kaizen and Quality Systems Auditor Certificate 19011 1st / 2nd Part (Internal audits and suppliers) in June 2011 by Editor Chief of Organization Quality from March 2012 New Head of Quality Management System in Aditech. .

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger ...
photo by: kmillard92
This entry was posted on Thursday, July 5, 2012 by Gianluca Gaggioli on Thursday, July 5, 2012 at 06:30 and belongs to the category Breaking News Breaking News , measurement analysis and improvement . You can follow any responses to this entry through the feed RSS 2.0 . Leave a comment !

Currently 2 comments have been left to "Critical Path Method and Program Evaluation Review techinique"

  1. 1
    pierpaolo said:
    July 5, 2012

    Forgive me but what should serve the copy and paste of familiar topics and stranoti in operations research?

    Whatever the PERT CPM which are also represented in matrix form much more easily interpretable than the graphs.

    Greetings

  2. 2
    Gianluca Gaggioli said:
    July 5, 2012

    Thank you for your valuable contribution, If you think it would be interesting to know more, certainly treated by you in an original and not yet exposed.

Leave a comment

Receive an alert when there are new comments. Or subscribe without commenting.

Go to »